Let us reason a bit about races and racism, part 4

We have already spoken about the attemps of the elimination of the word race in its original biological sense and what I call: What meets the eyes should be obvious. We are running on Earth at least with 3 basic Genepools of different species. I mentioned already that I do not know, where the Red Indians fit in, for me they look like a Hybrid Race between Denisovans, Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens. Note my words: I did not say it is like that. I formulated just an idea out of my observations - but they are based just on mainly pictures and videos and only on observations on one living Red Indian who I ever met. He goes by the name Arte Reade and is teaching all over in Europe interestingly enough aside selfresponsibility also his interpretations of the Bible. (By the way he is the onliest spiritual teacher of these days, who I can recommend so far allthough I am not a Christian believer). He is also my living example of those genetical traces, which I see in Red People. See some pictures of him here. What do you see? You might like to listen to the Red Indian, who unfortunately died recently, who is warning the White Race. Who of course is an inspiration to listen to is Russell Means and his wife. 

Would you know the differences of their features from White People and if so, which are the differences? I want to encourage you to use your eyes and to watch properly. This will not only train you in watching bodies but entirely train you in what is now so often propagandist (not really practized) by the word awareness. What it is the use of your awareness, if you cannot even read in the face of a man or woman, where she or he comes from and will probably go. Who are they: who are their ancestors and what had been their stories? In these days people do not even greet each other but yet they are posting all day and night about their awareness. What a degenerated ´joke`. The Christians among you: "Do you have eyes but fail to see, and ears but fail to hear?" Is that not a quote from your Bible?

It is legend that the Red People had great skills in reading from even far away, when somebody would be on the way to them- including enemies. So what it is the use of your eyes, ears and nose and all the rest of your senses in your temple (your body), if you do not use nor train them like the Red Folks do?

In the Bible -remember -you find the popular story, that God (alias Jehovah) created Eve out of Adams rips. And he did that in the Garden of Eden. Did you ever realize, that there had already been people around that joyful garden? Could well be that you were not part of those guys in the garden, who pro-created bit different. Have a look here and also on these 2 faces. Since Arthurs stupid trial to unite the Druids with the Churches this imposter could even make it into the realms of the Druids. Did you see all the lookalikes in the linked video? If not .. go and check (1:35) again and know you need to train your eyes. How long do you think is the knowlege about genetics and procreation already around? Something new? Because humans evolved that much in the last 100 years? Or is the very topic already mentioned in Gen-Isis (Bible)? "Let us make men in our image", we owe it to Jordan Maxwell, who had put our attention on that funny sentance in the Bible again and again. God was talking to himself or who? So Genetics might have been around since a very long time. There are exactly 2 groups of people who are known to pro-create among themselves because of their love  for theatre. They really love to shapeshift even from a Reptile into a Royal. Just think about that kind of insanity, that both of them groups love to impose the Kalergi Plan on all human species and subspecies. Could well be that they got insane by too much of inbreeding, don`t you think so?

Back to scripture once more but first get some impressive thoughts about scriptures here. Allthough true, that we should first built up and train our own senses and thinking capacities it is not true, what the so called Romans tell us again and again.

Europeans had their own writing skills, they were called Runes. The fact that they are not circulating has nothing to do with their non-existance but with the Roman-tellers, who used to burn books wherever they came along, keeping their whisdom of course for themselves. Even the word book stems from European Nature and not from the Romans, who were Invadors. The word book stems from the German word Buch (meaning book) which also formed the word Buchstabe (meaning letter). And that is so because the writings were done with sticks (der Stab, plural: die Staben) from trees (from beeches) and were used on trees or products from trees (like paper). Runes were also used on stones like these. The word Meilenstein (milestone) stems probably from them - at least that it is what I assume. The entire European Tribal system had also developed a highly sophisticated science of the Gods, embedded in the Edda and embraced by the Tree of Life named Yggdrasil.

Unfortunately or probably even gladly we must now remember our stories, which we used to store and hide within our DNA because they were forbidden and kept away in the underground caves of the Roman-Tellers known as Vatican. The Inquisition had been about exactly those great stories and whisdom of our European past, the theft and hi-jacking of that wisdom and the extermination of the European people. White genocide is not a new thing but a very old one. We only whitness a refreshing of it also including part of those, who are not of original European essence but are hybrids of different degrees. They might be par example Jews; knowingly and also unknowingly descendants of Gentile/Jewish parents, who were grown by their gentile mother par example after WWII, when a lot of German women got raped under the order of the Red Army. Jewish people have different appearances than white folks but get easily seen as white people. Here you find a detailed description of their appearances. Please concentrate on the given factual informations and not on notes concerning beauty or what have you. We are not looking here for any kind of discriminations. The most interesting different appearance is the flat back part of the head as more turk-asiatic things get. Find more here.

The cephalix index describes the different appearances of skulls. Some people are arguing that this index is not of importance. Well -it is- because the seize of the skull of an unborn baby should fit the pathway bones of his mother so that she must neither give birth under pains nor die. According to my philosophy what meets the eyes should be obvious we can also argue: different heads = different contents. This could concern a lot of things: intelligence, empathy, imagination and more. Too much mixes might bring degenerations over times such as psychological problems as there are 2 in 1 in the beginning and in further generations even more than 2 in 1. Donkeys are simular with horses but are they the same, really? Each of them in its origin is nice; so called bastards can be very beautiful but they can also bring over generations all sorts of weaknesses.

I guess, humans were formed probably all over the world. Did we ever got the idea that trees and other plants originated on a specific continent?

For me this idea makes no sense but it makes sense to me that the human-trees grew on all continents and interacted with their environments, what gave them their specific shapes and skills; those who were of importance came into their genepool. Meanwhile there are some courageous scientist who do not pretend anymore that they would believe in the Out-of-Africa-Theory. 

Let us reason a bit about races and racism, part 3

What meets the eye should be obvious and is by the way part of the definition of science. Science operates on observation and experimentation, which both together bring solide proofs that something is or is not, can be done or cannot be done. It is also intertwined if not based on desire, will power and imagination. That simply means, if you have no desire to cook your food in a vessel but feel comfortable to either eat raw food or food which you prepare in or over fire, then not even the imagination of something like pottery enters your (inner) eye let alone any trials to produce it. For the last part you do not only need the desire but also the power of will so that you can endure your experimentations till you get a result according to your wishes. 

Unfortunately many people came to believe (meaning: to be lied to) that science would be something for experts, who I prefer to call story tellers because most of them are seldom the inventors of something, let alone of something useful for mankind; par example most folks in modern medicin. Most of their "science" is simply quackery; it works but different than you thought it would. Accept a chemotherapy and know that by 97% you will soon be dead after a good while of tuff pains. So, unfortunately science can also be used to poison or kill you.

May be you have had invented a nice building, something like a castle or palace. Could well be that another one cannot do this by him own but desires to have it. So medicin used to float between good and evil, at least for a very long part in his- and also our-story. Of course there are other scientist who are doing well in all categories mentioned above. Many of them die by unusual death, in case that we can still classify murder as something unusual. So you should not be gullible and believe into any of them experts till proven to you,  that they really are, what they pretend to be.

Hopefully you can see that science must be and is in fact also part of your own life? At least, I guess, you change the doctor, if he had killed already most of your familymembers, don`t you? So you got a desire of staying alive in best case also healthy and the will power to endure the experimentations ... on your family members ...till you find a result which meets your wishes (your survival). Unfortunately we must find these days that many people do not match the criterias of science any longer. You can almost give them any kind of poison, another pill or a smart phone: they are finished. We can only hope for a kind of resurrection for them. Otherwise we must admit:
Cro-Magnon is nearly dead, hopefully those with more European Neanderthal DNA can overcome those kind of experimentations which once  might have startet with some sort of romantical love. In case of the Red Indeans this went horrific astray.

Well, who could have resistet such beautiful ding ding? I could not! And this might have been the sweet result in other cases of strong attractions. But the story tellers about those sweet results prefer of course other stories than those which meet the eyes. Well let me tell you my story, which is always based on :

What meets the eyes is obvious! 

Black people are different from white people. Do I need to mention that they as well as white people are different from yellow people? Well I am not that sure how the red man fits in: Are they Neanderthalensis (white man) or Homo Sapien Sapiens (black man) or Denisovans (yellow man) or all of it or an entire own specie?

Let me stay with what I know by observations and experimentations (please note, that humor is not given to everyone. The thing is that I had white lovers as well as black lovers and that sums up to observations and experiences). So let me talk about Neanderthalensis and Homo Sapien Sapiens and their love for each other. Love? Yes, of course! It fucking happened. Again and again! Sometimes secretely and probably ending like in Romeo & Julia because the Bloodlines of them did not agree into their love and it also happened by force due to slavery, arranged marriages and voodoo.

Meanwhile by the way you should know that slavery was not an invention of white folks but white folks were rather those who finished it, at least in the countries of their influence including most of the African countries. Please black people get your facts clear out of a black mens mouth (somehow he got a Jew???) and stop insulting white people as being guilty for that shit. It is called by the way racism, to put guilt on an entire people; things get even more bad, if not only the whole race (or specie) gets spoken guilty for some of their members guilt but despicable, if the freedom, which was gained so far, was reached by those, who some of you relentlessly accuse based on lies while enjoying their achievements. But these notes move now into topics beyond biological affairs and will be discussed in another post, probably as part 4 of this little serie. Let us get back to the biological affairs.

What is it, that meets the eyes so that we can differentiate between species and/or races? There are of course the obvious signs like the colour of skin, the colour of hairs and the colour of the eyes.

Neanderthals, as more original or pure they are, do not have black skins, nor black hairs, nor black eyes. They have either blond, ashblond, ginger or brown hairs, which are not complete soft and flat but from a bit soft and flat to curley but still soft hairs. The colour of their eyes are blue, grew, green or brown - sometimes even a mixture of those colours. All non-Neanderthals have black hairs and at least brown if not even black eyes. Asians and Red Indians (North- and Southamerica) have flat and soft black hairs while black people have as the onliest race (or specie) black Rastas, which are much stronger structured than the hairs of all other folks. No one could so far explain somehow reasonable how the black race, if the Out-of-Africa-Theory would be true, could manage to transform those genetical markers in those of the other races and why this should have appeared. Even if their hybrid children are opposed to Northern Climates no changes of the black genetic markers appear than those given by the Neanderthal or Denovian. In most cases the curley rasta hairs are even dominant. But I have seen also a girl with strong blong curley but soft Neanderthal hairs with otherwise much of black-people markers, just like those children shown already above.

Apart from those commonly well known genetical markers of the races/species there are much of other differences between them, which make the Out-of-Africa-Theory even more unbelievable. A pretty dominant marker is that of the bottom. Anyone with eyes knows that only black people have bottoms which are much stronger and outstanding than those flat bottoms of Neanderthals and Denisovans. This is not a secret. Some black tribal people even have strong outward going soles. Then again we find something pretty significant. Black Africans have more and denser skin layers than the other races. The list of all what meets the eyes could be continued but is not intented by this author. Intended is, that readers check the facts and do not pretend that we are all equal though we are obvious not equal. I had been with my black spouse at a doctor where a bloodtest should be done. This got somehow funny because the medical stuff did not know how to enter the needle into his skin. The lady was scared to death to probably hurt him but also shocked that her normal approach of the needle did not function. Only when I told her, that he has more skin layers than white people have, she got couraged to put much more force on the procedure. I hear you crying ... but please hold on: No, my friend could not speak for him own because he spoke French. In Germany this language is not commonly spoken, okay???? You see how Cultural Marxism works? It enters like a viruse in peoples brain so that they cannot base anything naturally on what meets their eyes and senses. And in some medical emergencies such non-sense can be pretty dangerous as you can see by the given example. You would not have such mental confusions, if dogs from different races or even species like wolf-dogs were concerned, would you?

To complete this little lecture on differences between the races/ethnies/species, you should also know, that we react naturally shy and even frightened towards people from other races/species. All of us, alike if Neanderthals, Denisovans or Homo Sapien Sapiens feel like that way even if many white people would pretend (according to their brainwashings: We are all the same...) as if they were not shy nor scared at all.

But the reality of the different Species/Rases are so seriously embedded into our nature (inner knowledge), that at first contact we cannot even see the differences between the people of foreign specie. All black people seem to be look alikes, all asians seem to be look-alike- and vice versa, if they see white people. At first, the differences are so overwhelming that naturally inner distance and a sort of self defence occurs but cultural marxist will have you believe otherwise. Like other ethnies/species/races please my fellow white Neanderthals, free yourself from cultural marxism and their mind controland agenda. We are living in times in which you will need to defend yourself. You will be perceived as what you are and so you should also perceive and act based on your intuitions: they will show you, if things are really friendly, pretended as friendly or whatever.

Let us reason a bit about races and racism, part 2

We have found already the definitions for the terms specie and race in part 1.

The term race ( now leaving the other uses out) appears to be a subcategory under the term specie, isn`it? Let us have a deeper look into that in the animal world.

Source of the picture 

You might wonder what had happened, if you are among the elder generations. Noop! No more races ... Remember that we learnt already from Encyclopedia Brittanica, that this "social contruct" had to disappear and so it did, at least concerning the term. Because the Bear came into my mind as a good example to explain the order between specie and race, I just felt into the trap by my first google-click. We do not use that term anymore but specie instead. Look it up under The Eight (8) Bear species of the world.

What again had been the definition for a specie?

"Species, in biology, classification comprising related organisms that share common characteristics and are capable of interbreeding."

That means each of these Bear species can interbreed among themselves, or what? Let us look into this as well. Ups, suddenly we find another one ... Cappuccino Bear Probably you cannot understand German, so let me translate what it is being told by the German story-tellers: 

Scientest would classify this bear as hybrid between Ice-Bear and Grizzle Bear. Allthough this would sound funny it is in reality alarming, so they say. Scientest were thinking before, that the Ice-Bear and the Grizzle-Bear were not able to interbreed, at least their children would not be able to co-create. But all by a sudden Capuccinos of the second generation would be seen more and more... and now sit down, the point of the story comes: The Climate Change would be responsible for that. Guess the heat among their genitals made them hot, or so. And this would end up with the Grizzly as being the hotter one (?????? ask them story-tellers for their logic) However (for what we get no explanation) finally only some genes of the Ice-Bear would be left within the Grizzly-Bear. 

Does that sound familiar? Neanderthal is ringing in your brain? 

Or probably these question? 
White Genocide? 
Will the Brown Grizzly overtake?  
Africa for Black people alone? Sure? 
Or will it be more The Cappucino one? 

Let us ask Judas. 

Judas needs some sort of climate change; so now we know. The program is easy, at least to understand: Make people believe, that sinner-man-made Climate Change kills the Ice-Bear, so that it is better to block the sun and vaccinate the clouds ...and kill as much as Species as even possible, at least reduce them seriously but especially the Neanderthal. Let us find a reason like an emergency which looks like 911 and will give a perfect excuse to kill enough Arabs, so that the rest of them feels motivated to overrun the Neanderthal because he -the Neanderthal- will be constantly blamed for all what had happened worse. This liar agenda had been running since some decades and is called the Kalergi Plan. Constantly especially the black people got told, that they were enslaved by White Supremacy and this got channelled into the racial hatred against white people performed by Black Life Matters in the US and into a special kind of going along with Feminism and the Islamic Idea of world domination. It needs a kind of small thinking -I guess- to integrate all of these bullshit ideologies in one head but it really functioned. And it did not only function among black people but also among white people. May be we find some answers why this functioned here or here. May be a more simple answer is idiotism, which did not yet disappear from mankind. The Pied Piper Phenomen is known since a long time. I remember how we as children used to rhyme: Doof bleibt doof, da helfen keine Pillen (it means: Stupid remains stupid, no pills will help about it). Unfortunately the opposite is the case: pills and vaccinations help to stupify entire nations.

But back to Neanderthal. Were they part of the specie Homo Sapien Sapiens? In clever Wikipedia we learn, that Mankind had been classified from 1930 till 1990 as Homo sapien sapiens (meaning more clever than the homo sapien - the apeman) while the Neanderthal was classified as Homo sapien Neanderthalensis. Since 1990 Neanderthalensis does not count any longer as part of the Human specie. Clever Wikipedia tells us that Neanderthalensis now gets classified as apeman under the name Homo Neanderthalensis. Wow, the one with the big brain got declassified: not even a bit Sapien (wise, intelligent) is honored to him anylonger. Let us have a look at his brain again.

The skull on the right side is that one of Neanderthal. Do not know about you but for me it looks a bit like Pharaos head - at least concerning the seize. See another one here. And it does not look like this. But especially it does not really sound very clever to me why someone with a small brain should be more clever than someone with a bigger brain. The skull does not look like the head of this guy either. The Neanderthalensis skull and body does instead look for me more like the one of those who could have built Megalith buildings.

You see, something special happened, when they had found the Neanderthalensis Skull. The German Government could not hurry on faster to get the place digged under. The Grave looks now like this.
Could it be, that these people were hiding the white mens origin? Could it be that we, the white people, are at least hybrid-descendants of Neanderthalensis? And could it be that the death of that Ice-bear is such urgent for Judas because Neandethalensis is finally too strong and will overcome their desire to enslave the whole population? Meanwhile they could at least not hide any longer that only Europeans and Euraseans have Neanderthalensis DNS. For now and till part III,  I will leave you with the following video to let you overthink and research by your own, if it could be, that white Europeans are the descendants of the Neanderthals.

Let us reason a bit about races and racism, part 1

Sometimes the definitions of words brings clearity along, meaning more facts than opinions. I prefer facts over opinions, especially in these crazy days, when sheer everyone is pulling out all kind of opinions but escpecially when the facts are talking too loud. In such cases you can easily get attacked with the phrase: "but it is my opinion". This simply means: "I am out of facts" or "I cannot refute those facts (you mentioned) and so I will shut you down with my opinion." 

And they, who talk like that, mean it. See here what the word opinion actually means. It is a choice of someone, what would not be a problem in itself but is also used in a reasoning or debate as mentioned before; so it can also include, that the person does not mind facts, if they could shine some light on that persons intentions. 

An honest -also for others well meaning- person does not attack you with his or her "opinions". In all my life I never ever experienced someone clean hearded referring to his or her "opinion", when facts were presented; never, not even a single time within 60 years. 

People, who stated their opinion (But it is my opinion!!!), did I only experience, when they needed to shut down the presentation and debate of facts. So, I wonder why we got the constitutional right to declare our opinions. I would rather prefer people to shut their mouth, if they do not have anything to say, what it is based on facts. Such people are usually at least pretty dumb or lazy; well, laziness and stupidity belong to each other. So we do not really talk about something like a democratic process or what it is commonly associated with the word "democracy", when we talk about the right to speak our opinions (let us spare out the genesis and definition of "democracy" in this post, or things will get endless).


Lately we could all see such demonstrations of factless opinions in their final stage in the US (Source of the picture). Please also spare me out of that mindless and factless "debate", if the orange masque wearing president is worse than the black masque wearing president, who both follow the same master; next to Iran and always in the name of ISRAEL. In the US those "presidents" can tell the people the same Agenda without even changing a bit of the main words; it doesn`t matter. It is part of their meaningless elections to have big ballaballa shows over the period of 1,5 years, when the flag will be skaken and America is super will be used as a Mantra. By the time Obomber got hailed, the Mantra had been: Yes, we can! WOW, I bow down to such kind of intelligence: America is super this time again versus Yes, we can. This last time even the best comedy show could not compete with that kind of "ballaballa" based on nothing than that the (transgender) show must go on. 

Any robot can speak out opinions which are not based on facts nor on care for the wellness of the concernced people. So, such opinions usually also do not concern our beloved enemies (Elites or however you want to label them, who love to hide themselves). Indeed the opposite is the case: those beloved enemies love it, if most people  just talk "opinions" based on nothing sometimes not even on a specific intention than the one to bloek like a sheep.  Nevertheless and because I am going to touch the holy words race and racism, I better make my legal statement, that I am expressing my considerations and my opinions. Concerning certain feelings like "being offended" please watch this.

What is a race? In many dictionaries you will find slightly different meanings for the term:

1. "a strong current of water"

2. "run in competition against"

3. "people of common descent"

In the LEO-Translator you find a much longer list of meanings. But essentially you find also there the main characteristics of the term, that x is fluent and can occur in competition to another x and that races refer to generations, meaning tribes with a timeline which includes past, present and future. So far, nothing that complicate to understand, till it comes to the so called human species. 

The term Species is defined as follows:

"Species, in biology, classification comprising related organisms that share common characteristics and are capable of interbreeding."

But as nearer we enter into the NEW WORLD ORDER biology seems to disappear, at least for the human species. And so we get declared by the Encyclopaedia Brittannica, that science had it all wrong so far and that genetic studies would refute the concept of races; they were all a kind of made up (social constructs) beginning in the 15th centuries. WOW. They even declare us in that article that that concept never existed at all ... only in that period from the 15th century till lately. So now, I guess, we are correcting mankinds mistakes. Not only do we declare the genders as social constructs but also the races. They simply do not exist! We came all out of Africa where Lucy bred us into existance (In the Bible of course we get more the straight transgender version: we were made from Adams rips).

Allthough we had not been such much of people in those first Homo Sapien days in Africa some of our ancestors got the silly idea to move into such regions like Siberia. They did not fly, they did not drive, they went there and to many other places. That is the current still running Out-of-Africa-Belief, sorry ...I wanted to say science. The problem now is: Where -par example- do we put Neanderthal? Somehow he got into our genes before he died out some 30.000 years ago. Ups, noop - this is also not anymore true. They died out earlier, about 60.000 years ago. But the problem remained anyway: why did they die out? The scientist did not want to tell us such a story that Homo Sapien Sapien would have genocided them, so they tell us that this was physically not possible. With other words we- the Homo Sapien Sapiens- were weaker than the Neanderthalers. They had not only bigger brains but also stronger bones. See that here on the left side you see homo sapien sapiens. Don`t you think - the Neanderthals must have also been better adapted to the European region than the Newcomers from sunny Africa? 

For that very question the storytellers came up with the idea that the brains of the Newcomers from Africa had been smaller but more clever. How did they get that story together? Please study the already linked article once again so that you get a proper idea about science. They are really telling us, that Neanderthals had to focus too much on getting some light through dark Europe for what they needed to grow big eyes. And those eyes would have taken too much of braincapacities away. So, now we got it: The obvious bigger brain of the Neanderthals needed to be made somehow smaller so that Homo Sapien Sapiens could appear more clever. Is that science, racism or just well paid stupidity? Read ....

"By contrast, modern humans, from sunny Africa, had no need for this adaptation and instead they evolved frontal loves, which are associated with high-level processing. ´More of the Neanderthal brain appears to have been dedicated to vision and body control, leaving less brain to deal with other functions like social networking," Pearce told BBC News."

Well, these storytellers forgot to tell us how the Sunny Boys from Lucy in Africa, who did not evolve big shining eyes nor strong Neanderthal bodies, could then cut themselves through the dark forrests of Europe ...let alone that Facebook and other Social Medias had not yet been installed those days. The story reminds me on the story Cancler Merkel is promoting these days: All the non-European Sunny-Boys, who are coming these days to Europe are well educated specialized stuff. Could well be, that we get the fresh Neanderthals here in Europe and the Sunny-Boys from everywhere else get Homo Sapien Sapien Sapiens .....at least the outcome of their seeds. So please World let it be known, that no one in 30.-60.000 years need to ask what had happened to us; please make notes and preserve them well for Homo Sapien Sapien Sapiens.

"Our leaders had had pretty small brains but therefore huge pockets. They would take and do everything to remain rich and get richer. So they let other people into our areas. They wanted them to kill us, so that they could take everything we sweat for. Some of those invaders were yellow, others were light-brown and others again were dark brown. And they were many. There had not been enough space for them and us and so they first raped us and then killed us and then each other because they did not know how to enlighten our forrests". Edited by Neanderthals 2.

After this little praxis education in the topic of race and racism let us get back to the theory. We have already learnt that

"Species (are), in biology, classification comprising related organisms that share common characteristics and are capable of interbreeding." We now must also understand that interbreeding can happen by consent or ...